I don't like Doctorow much
This post was inspired by Ryland's post. I don't like the book much so far regardless the time period it's to be read in - even if it was bringing up hot topics of discussion back when it was written, I quite dislike Doctorow and his writing style, and his book gives off such "holier than thou" vibes to me.
He sure makes fun of a white revolutionary a whole lot for being a white guy writing a book in which the main conflict is a very morally ambiguous black character. He can't write a very opinionated book and then, just because he's not satirizing the black character harshly, have readers agree with him satirizing the white character in a black movement. Which is not at all to say that white people can't ever write black characters, but he seems to be very close to the line of what he's so readily picking apart in his book.
He's not bringing much new to the table, he's just there to make fun of people, not even in a constructive way. I think this might mean I'm not going to like postmodernism much overall if this is the style, because honestly the over-the-top descriptions of child factories and racism have not taught me anything nor entertained me. Maybe other postmodern novelists come off less self-important? The book has some interesting moments but so often, it's just grating to read.
There are ways to write about your opinions and difficult topics while still making it a good read - not to say books should be all sunshine and roses, I'd say the most significant ones deal with difficult topics - but if Doctorow is putting the effort in of writing a book, why not make it something people want to read, that doesn't feel like talking to someone incredibly mean who's shoving their opinions down your throat in a conversation you didn't really want to have?
Of course, I understand that outside of school plenty of people read this book for entertainment, find it humorous, get something out of it, etc. I just don't like the pushy tone and making fun of clearly established bad things, that suddenly starts dealing with a more current, delicate issue. I'm sure plenty of people in the class are enjoying the book so if you do have strong thoughts let me know, maybe I'm missing stuff.
I agree. Having now finished it, my thoughts are unchanged. Doctorow goes out of his way to inject irony and ambiguity into situations in the book in an effort to say something nuanced and to me it just falls flat. Like really what was going on with YB and blackface, does even he know the point he was trying to make? I just have to agree on all accounts with this post.
ReplyDeleteThe kind of irony that characterizes Doctorow's narrative definitely runs the risk of seeming smug and superior--like, "look at these fools running around talking crazy," with the narrator in a seemingly superior position hovering over everyone. For some readers, the "punching up" satirical dynamic saves this tone--we don't feel so bad giggling at Morgan in his pyramid, since this is satirizing the wealthy and powerful. The novel's irony seems (mostly) on the "side" of the poor and downtrodden, but it still might rub us the wrong way when he's all "poor Father, I see him now" after the Family patriarch dies on the Lusitania.
ReplyDelete